> On Feb 3, 2016, at 1:08 PM, Phil Blundell <p...@pbcl.net> wrote: > > On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 12:59 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: >> in systems of this age it should be yet. > > Sorry, I didn't really understand that comment.
systems of today ( new systems ). read ‘yet' as 'yes' > > For what it's worth, as a very quick and fairly unscientific comparison, > I did "time make -j4" in a glibc tree and got: > > real 1m38.812s > user 4m6.420s > sys 0m23.148s > > and then I cleaned the tree and did "time make -j4 CFLAGS='-O2 -g > -pipe'" and got: > > real 1m37.299s > user 4m21.420s > sys 0m27.304s > > I'm not sure these results are statistically significant but on this > very limited evidence it certainly doesn't look like -pipe is providing > any transformational benefits. The real time has gone down a tiny bit, > which suggests that -pipe is giving some extra parallelism, but the > system and user time have both actually gone up in the second case. Some bigger loads like webkit might be a better sample. > > p. > >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
