On 29 January 2016 at 21:21, Burton, Ross <ross.bur...@intel.com> wrote:
> And for even more fun the resulting package doesn't actually depend on
> libssl, due to the layout confusing the shlibs code in package.bbclass.
>
Sigh. Clearly I need a break. Inserted a load of debugging and then the
obvious jumped out at me.
Using oe-pkg-data to see what files are in what packages:
apr-util:
/usr/lib/libaprutil-1.so.0
/usr/lib/libaprutil-1.so.0.5.4
...
apr-util-dev:
...
/usr/lib/apr-util-1/apr_crypto_openssl-1.so
/usr/lib/apr-util-1/apr_crypto_openssl.so
/usr/lib/apr-util-1/apr_dbm_gdbm-1.so
/usr/lib/apr-util-1/apr_dbm_gdbm.so
Those .so files are not development links, but library modules. They
should be packaged into FILES_$PN, and no mention of apr-util-1 in
FILES_PN-dev.
Ross
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
