On Fri, 2016-01-22 at 20:49 +0000, Khem Raj wrote: > OE core provides systemd,busybox as options for system init system along > with sysvinit being the default. Document the needed settings to enable > systemd and busybox as options if user wishes. > > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> > --- > meta/conf/local.conf.sample | 17 +++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/meta/conf/local.conf.sample b/meta/conf/local.conf.sample > index a662f4d..b760546 100644 > --- a/meta/conf/local.conf.sample > +++ b/meta/conf/local.conf.sample > @@ -209,6 +209,23 @@ PACKAGECONFIG_append_pn-qemu-native = " sdl" > PACKAGECONFIG_append_pn-nativesdk-qemu = " sdl" > #ASSUME_PROVIDED += "libsdl-native" > > +# > +# Use busybox/mdev for system initialization > +# > +#VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_dev_manager = "busybox-mdev" > +#VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_login_manager = "busybox" > +#VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_init_manager = "busybox" > +#VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_initscripts = "initscripts" > +#VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_keymaps = "keymaps" > +#DISTRO_FEATURES_BACKFILL_CONSIDERED += "sysvinit" > + > +# > +# Use systemd for system initialization > +# > +#DISTRO_FEATURES_append = " systemd sysvinit" > +#DISTRO_FEATURES_BACKFILL_CONSIDERED += "sysvinit"
Why is sysvinit included in both DISTRO_FEATURES and DISTRO_FEATURES_BACKFILL_CONSIDERED? My understanding is that BACKFILL_CONSIDERED only makes sense when the value is not included in DISTRO_FEATURES. -- Tanu -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
