On Tue, 12 Jan 2016 15:23:33 Khem Raj wrote: > Hi > > We cache size of off_t in site files and the value is 4 in most cases > > > meta/site/arm-linux:ac_cv_sizeof_off_t=${ac_cv_sizeof_off_t=4} > meta/site/ix86-common:ac_cv_sizeof_off_t=${ac_cv_sizeof_off_t=4} > meta/site/nios2-linux:ac_cv_sizeof_off_t=${ac_cv_sizeof_off_t=4} > meta/site/powerpc32-linux:ac_cv_sizeof_off_t=${ac_cv_sizeof_off_t=4} > meta/site/x32-linux:ac_cv_sizeof_off_t=${ac_cv_sizeof_off_t=8} > meta/site/x86_64-linux:ac_cv_sizeof_off_t=${ac_cv_sizeof_off_t=8} > > > However this value is wrong when largefile support is enabled (which is > default) on most OE based distros. It also lands us in nasty bugs which are > complicated to uncover eg. the curl issue > > http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=3c58712465494e441c4 > 036a7cf21d2e6d343efab > > and just in OE-Core more e.g. grub2,libsndfile1,pax are showing same > symptoms. > > I think this value should be left for configure to compute and > autotools.bbclass should pass --{enable|disable}-largefile based upon > DISTRO_FEATURES enabling largefile support > > Do we see any downsides or point I might have missed
IIRC I think the issue was older configure scripts without the capability to compute this properly (where we're not auto-reconf'ing them). Ross, any thoughts? Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core