Ross > On Jan 5, 2016, at 9:31 AM, Burton, Ross <ross.bur...@intel.com> wrote: > > On 5 January 2016 at 09:32, Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulw...@oss.bmw-carit.de > <mailto:lukas.bulw...@oss.bmw-carit.de>> wrote: > Due to the version update to 1.59.0, the two patches previously > backported in this recipe are now dropped. The actual status of > the arm-intrinsics.patch (reported with Upstream-Status: Backport) > is unknown to the committer, and hence, that patch is kept in the > recipe, even if it is possibly not required anymore. A deeper > analysis is required to determine need and status of that patch. > Furthermore, boost 1.59.0 provides a new library, called timer, > which is packaged as further library in the boost recipe. The > update to boost 1.60.0 required no further changes beyond > changing the checksum hashes. > > This is breaking on mpc8315e-rdb (the reference PPC in meta-yocto-bsp): > > | gcc.compile.c++ > bin.v2/libs/test/build/aca09349fdb84d131321425f6c3a38ed/execution_monitor.o > | In file included from > /data/poky-master/tmp/sysroots/mpc8315e-rdb/usr/include/fenv.h:114:0, > | from > /data/poky-master/tmp/sysroots/mpc8315e-rdb/usr/include/c++/5.3.0/fenv.h:36, > | from ./boost/detail/fenv.hpp:97, > | from ./boost/test/execution_monitor.hpp:64, > | from ./boost/test/impl/execution_monitor.ipp:31, > | from libs/test/src/execution_monitor.cpp:16: > | ./boost/test/impl/execution_monitor.ipp: In function 'unsigned int > boost::fpe::enable(unsigned int)': > | ./boost/test/impl/execution_monitor.ipp:1383:7: error: expected > id-expression before '(' token > | ::feclearexcept(BOOST_FPE_ALL); > | ^ > | ./boost/test/impl/execution_monitor.ipp: In function 'unsigned int > boost::fpe::disable(unsigned int)': > | ./boost/test/impl/execution_monitor.ipp:1420:7: error: expected > id-expression before '(' token > | ::feclearexcept(BOOST_FPE_ALL); > | ^ > > Any idea? >
these source files might not be including boost’s own fenv.hpp header might be.
I wonder is SPE has issues with FPU status functions can you try to build a
small sample using feclearexcept()
something like
#include <fenv.h>
int main()
{
feclearexcept (FE_ALL_EXCEPT);
return 0;
}
does it link ?
> Ross
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
