On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 12:53:10PM -0800, Andre McCurdy wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Andre McCurdy <armccu...@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> meta/classes/qemu.bbclass | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/classes/qemu.bbclass b/meta/classes/qemu.bbclass
>> index 315c17f..4ec7657 100644
>> --- a/meta/classes/qemu.bbclass
>> +++ b/meta/classes/qemu.bbclass
>> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ QEMU_OPTIONS[vardeps] +=
>> "QEMU_EXTRAOPTIONS_${PACKAGE_ARCH}"
>> QEMU_EXTRAOPTIONS_iwmmxt = " -cpu pxa270-c5"
>> QEMU_EXTRAOPTIONS_armv6 = " -cpu arm1136"
>> QEMU_EXTRAOPTIONS_armv7a = " -cpu cortex-a8"
>> +QEMU_EXTRAOPTIONS_armv7ve = " -cpu cortex-a8"
>
> would it make sense to use cortex-a15 here? It's supported at least in
> qemu-2.5.0
Yes, I think you're right. If qemu configured for cortex-a8 is going
to barf on armv7ve integer division instructions then we should enable
an armv7ve cpu such as cortex-a15.
To avoid unnecessary diversity, should we then also use cortex-a15 for armv7a ?
>> QEMU_EXTRAOPTIONS_ppce500v2 = " -cpu e500v2"
>> QEMU_EXTRAOPTIONS_ppce500mc = " -cpu e500mc"
>> QEMU_EXTRAOPTIONS_ppce5500 = " -cpu e5500"
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
>> --
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
> --
> Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: martin.ja...@gmail.com
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
