On 2 December 2015 at 07:56, Maxin B. John <maxin.j...@intel.com> wrote:
> meta/recipes-core/jpeg/jpeg_9a.bb | 29 ------------------- > meta/recipes-core/jpeg/libjpeg-turbo_8d+1.4.2.bb | 36 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > (CCing the usual suspects who will notice and care about this) I've just noticed that this means that when the binary packages are debian-renamed the version goes backwards: libjpeg-9a to libjpeg-8d+1.4.2. Does anyone have an opinion on either: 1) ignore it 2) put an PE (epoch) in libjpeg-turbo 3) configure the debian renaming so the library has a different name (libjpeg-turbo, presumably) Ross
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
