On Fri, 2015-11-20 at 15:27 +0100, Andrew Shadura wrote: > The split is no longer necessary, and only makes it more complicated to > do changes in external layers.
I'm not sure about the "more complicated to do changes in external layers". Why is that? Quite the opposite, I found it useful that the version independent build rules (*) were in a .inc file and relied on including that .inc file in a "dbus-cynara" recipe which builds a specific fork of the source code [2]. But I understand that this is an unusual usage of OE-core. As I didn't notice the change in time (it's in master now), I'll just copy the previous content of dbus.inc. (*) However, a recent change in dizzy and fido already broke that separation when adding a patch for 1.8.2 to the .inc file instead of dbus-1.8.2.bb. [1] http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=a8aa06b2405dec31a306fdf47bd1fdf740fde7bd [2] https://github.com/01org/meta-intel-iot-security/blob/7026d6e8e1084def0ebf203799360b54b5ac2763/meta-security-framework/recipes-core/dbus/dbus-cynara_1.8.18.bb -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
