On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 09:13:22AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Maxin B. John <maxin.j...@intel.com> wrote: >> > This patch set provides libjpeg-turbo as a drop-in replacement for libjpeg. >> > >> > libjpeg-turbo is a fork of the original libjpeg project.Most of the major >> > Linux >> > distros (Fedora, Debian, OpenSUSE) moved from libjpeg to libjpeg-turbo >> > recently. >> > lbjpeg-turbo provides better JPEG compression/decompression(at least 25% >> > faster) >> > while maintaining same API/ABI as libjpeg. >> > >> > Once we reach an agreement on this, based on the decision, we can move the >> > libjpeg package to meta-oe for applications which may depend on API >> > version 9. >> >> I support this change, due: >> >> - agreement with major Linux distros >> - performance improvement >> >> I also think moving libjpeg (API version 9) for meta-oe is fine as >> well. I am not aware of any application which requires it, though. > > I'm not aware of any as well, so I would prefer to drop libjpeg > completely. > > + less junk in meta-oe > + people were confused about multiple jpeg providers before, now they > would be again, but without good reason (as nobody knows about apps > depending on libjpeg9).
Agreed. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
