On 26-10-15 16:13, Sergey 'Jin' Bostandzhyan wrote:
Hi,

I recently ran into a problem that I described here:
https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8578 and while debugging
this issue an other problem came to light.

I have a multimachine configuration (armv5/imx6) and the same distro for both
of them (poky 2.0 RC based).

I have some allarch packages which have no DEPENDS, however which have an
RDEPENDS_${PN} setting.

I can see that even though there were no changes to the recipe itself and
also no changes to the recipes listed in RDEPENDS, my recipe still gets
rebuilt each time.

What we tried:

<bluelightning> so cleansstate the recipe, change machine, cleansstate again,
                 then build it, then change machine, build it again and note
                 the first task that executes

The logs for these steps, one with RDEPENDS and one without are at the end of
this mail. I can see that with present RDEPENDS "real" tasks get executed
even though no changes occured in the recipe; this is not the case when I
drop RDEPENDS.

Is this a bug or is this just something that needs to be documented?

I think it's the same problem as described here:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.handhelds.openembedded.core/70070/focus=70072

What is the "desired" behaviour?

Apparently, this needless rebuilding is "desired".



Kind regards,

Mike Looijmans
System Expert

TOPIC Embedded Products
Eindhovenseweg 32-C, NL-5683 KH Best
Postbus 440, NL-5680 AK Best
Telefoon: +31 (0) 499 33 69 79
Telefax: +31 (0) 499 33 69 70
E-mail: mike.looijm...@topicproducts.com
Website: www.topicproducts.com

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

Visit us at : Aerospace Electrical Systems Expo Europe which will be held from 
17.11.2015 till 19.11.2015, Findorffstrasse 101 Bremen, Germany, Hall 5, stand 
number C65
http://www.aesexpo.eu


--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to