On 10/19/2015 11:59 AM, Andre McCurdy wrote:
Andre McCurdy (5):
tune-corei7.inc: fix PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-corei7-32 typo
This change makes sense
tune-bonnell.inc: support for first generation Intel Atom CPUs
tune-silvermont.inc: support for second generation Intel Atom CPUs
tune-atom.inc: include tune-bonnell.inc instead of tune-core2.inc
tune-corei7.inc: update comments regarding Silvermont support
I am not sure these make sense, it adds additional complexity to an
already complex testing matrix.
Both the bonnell and silvermont tunes are fully part of their respective
core* tune settings, there is no real need to become more specific. We
know that newer code is starting to use intrinsics that can determine
the correct extensions based on the CPU type.
I know you replied partly to RP's query, but is there something specific
your trying to accomplish with these additional .incs that we don't
already do and if so what?
Sau!
meta-intel maintainer
meta/conf/machine/include/tune-atom.inc | 4 +--
meta/conf/machine/include/tune-bonnell.inc | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
meta/conf/machine/include/tune-corei7.inc | 6 ++---
meta/conf/machine/include/tune-silvermont.inc | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 meta/conf/machine/include/tune-bonnell.inc
create mode 100644 meta/conf/machine/include/tune-silvermont.inc
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
