On 10/12/2015 08:54 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Mon, 2015-10-12 at 05:35 -0400, wenzong....@windriver.com wrote:
From: Wenzong Fan <wenzong....@windriver.com>
"bzip2 -t FILE" returns 2 if FILE exists, but is not a valid bzip2 file.
"bzip2 -qt FILE" returns 0 when this happens, although it does print out
an error message as is does so.
This has been fix by Debian, just port changes from Debian patch file
"20-legacy.patch":
* Fixed "bunzip2 -qt returns 0 for corrupt archives" (Closes: #279025).
Signed-off-by: Wenzong Fan <wenzong....@windriver.com>
---
...bunzip2-qt-returns-0-for-corrupt-archives.patch | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++
meta/recipes-extended/bzip2/bzip2_1.0.6.bb | 1 +
2 files changed, 50 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
meta/recipes-extended/bzip2/bzip2-1.0.6/fix-bunzip2-qt-returns-0-for-corrupt-archives.patch
diff --git
a/meta/recipes-extended/bzip2/bzip2-1.0.6/fix-bunzip2-qt-returns-0-for-corrupt-archives.patch
b/meta/recipes-extended/bzip2/bzip2-1.0.6/fix-bunzip2-qt-returns-0-for-corrupt-archives.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..63d705d
--- /dev/null
+++
b/meta/recipes-extended/bzip2/bzip2-1.0.6/fix-bunzip2-qt-returns-0-for-corrupt-archives.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+From 8068659388127e8e63f2d2297ba2348c72b20705 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Wenzong Fan <wenzong....@windriver.com>
+Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 03:19:51 -0400
+Subject: [PATCH] bzip2: fix bunzip2 -qt returns 0 for corrupt archives
+
+"bzip2 -t FILE" returns 2 if FILE exists, but is not a valid bzip2 file.
+"bzip2 -qt FILE" returns 0 when this happens, although it does print out
+an error message as is does so.
+
+This has been fix by Debian, just port changes from Debian patch file
+"20-legacy.patch":
+
+* Fixed "bunzip2 -qt returns 0 for corrupt archives" (Closes: #279025).
+
+Upstream-Status: Backport [Debian]
+
What is the upstream position on this issue? That they won't fix it? I'm
not sure Backport is right for a debian patch since debian is not the
bzip2 upstream.
I wrongly thought that it was right, and we did have several "Backport [Debian]"
in oe-core/meta, should it be a Pending or Pending [Debian], please ?
// Robert
Cheers,
Richard
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
