On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kana...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I'm looking into the possibility of adding gobject introspection support > directly to oe-core for Yocto 2.1 release (Spring 2016). This work would of > course be based on meta-gir, but with the mandatory goal of producing > patches of sufficient quality that can be sent upstream. > > I know the upstream tarball is a mess that mashes together several different > things and was never designed for cross-compiling; and meta-gir is also > difficult to understand: autotools-based build files are patched using > undocumented patchfiles, then again patched from the recipe using sed, with > no comments anywhere - all that needs to be sorted. > > What's your take on this? Is it realistic? Would you be able to help out? > > Regards, > Alexander > -- I appreciate this very much - missing gir was a blocker many times for me. Especially if you'd manage to turn gir to more cross friendly state. Regarding support: Depends on my current challenges but running tests and reviews should be possible for me.
Andreas -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
