Hi Alex, On Thursday 24 September 2015 10:23:15 Alex Franco wrote: > Added core-image-empty recipe in meta-selftest/recipes-test/images > > [YOCTO #7664] > > Signed-off-by: Alex Franco <alejandro.fra...@linux.intel.com> > --- > meta-selftest/recipes-test/images/core-image-empty.bb | 7 +++++++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 meta-selftest/recipes-test/images/core-image-empty.bb > > diff --git a/meta-selftest/recipes-test/images/core-image-empty.bb > b/meta-selftest/recipes-test/images/core-image-empty.bb new file mode > 100644 > index 0000000..550567c > --- /dev/null > +++ b/meta-selftest/recipes-test/images/core-image-empty.bb > @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ > +SUMMARY = "An empty image." > +IMAGE_INSTALL = "" > +IMAGE_LINGUAS = "" > +PACKAGE_INSTALL = "" > +LICENSE = "MIT" > + > +inherit image
Can we call this "test-empty-image.bb" instead? Also it's not necessary to specify LICENSE, image.bbclass already sets LICENSE = "MIT" as the default. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core