Am 2015-09-28 um 08:47 schrieb Khem Raj:
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 11:44 PM, Carlos Rafael Giani
<d...@pseudoterminal.org> wrote:
The other patches in the list above, however, need to be reworked to apply
against 1.6.
0001-basetextoverlay-make-memory-copy-when-video-buffer-s.patch has been
rejected by upstream,
handle-audio-video-decoder-error.patch is under discussion.
taglist-not-send-to-down-stream-if-all-the-frame-cor.patch hasn't been
looked at yet by upstream.
Since these no longer apply cleanly against 1.6.0, we anyway have no option
but to delete them and wait until the authors reworked them.
hmmm, I would have preferred a conclusive situation where we know
exactly what they fixed and what we dont have when we drop them
somewhere in commit message, ideally they should be forward ported
along with recipe upgrades but its ok if you dont feel comfortable and
want to defer it to original submitters but then please CC the
submitters so they know whats needed of them
Yep, I already sent them a mail about the necessary rework a month ago,
when I was first trying out release candidates for 1.6, but I'll give
them a status update.
As for the patch that got rejected by upstream (but that I didn't
delete, because it can still be applied), do I delete this one as well?
Is there a general preference in such situations? I personally would
prefer to stick with what upstream does.
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
