On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 12:16 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
>
> On Aug 26, 2015 9:11 AM, "Patrick Ohly" <patrick.o...@intel.com>
> wrote:
> > +EXTRA_OEMAKE = "'CC=${CC}' 'RANLIB=${RANLIB}' 'AR=${AR}' 'CFLAGS=${CFLAGS}
> > ${@bb.utils.contains('PACKAGECONFIG', 'xattr', '', '-DWITHOUT_XATTR', d)}
> > -I${S}/include' 'BUILDDIR=${S}'"
> >
> Do I see a spurious " in the middle
The one in bb.utils.contains()? That is there intentionally: it's for
the "xattr enabled" case, in which case nothing gets added to
EXTRA_OEMAKE.
--
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
