On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 3:14 AM, ChenQi <qi.c...@windriver.com> wrote: > Hi Khem, > > I built core-image-minimal for qemuarm64. > There's a lot of failures and warnings at boot time and the system boots > into rescue mode. > And I also verified 199 has no such problem.
I verified once again specifically on qemuarm64, and all came up fine, with no service failures, btw you need these three patches together http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/commit/?h=kraj/master&id=31772f3fc4745100bedf2e0d67b140a9b22d3f4b http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/commit/?h=kraj/master&id=fcba0329bc1a2b9d6d071247011cd43a9271d251 http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/commit/?h=kraj/master&id=ddfe697d82e532e4c80e69f729170ca4571f7803 and I tried with gcc 4.9 this time. > > Best Regards, > Chen Qi > > > On 08/21/2015 09:46 AM, Randy MacLeod wrote: >> >> On 2015-08-20 09:17 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 6:04 AM, Philip Balister <phi...@balister.org> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 08/19/2015 10:21 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Burton, Ross <ross.bur...@intel.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 17 August 2015 at 16:41, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There are many reasons, for me its overlay support for >>>>>>> systemd-nspawn, >>>>>>> networkd has got many new features that is now usable w.r.t. IP >>>>>>> forwarding, >>>>>>> vxlan etc. >>>>>>> and it has many bug fixed in those 2000 odd commits since 219, no >>>>>>> different then any other package upgrades we do in general it keep >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> upgrade workload lower as we roll the releases. >>>>>>> Any specific concerns ? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Can we get an updated patch with a clearer commit log? >>>> >>>> >>>> I've also heard that as systemd evolves, more binaries are getting added >>>> to the base package that should be packaged separately for people >>>> interested in small images. I do not have personal experience here, but >>>> wanted to pass along the feedback. >>>> >>>> We should look at buildhistory packaging differences when we do >>>> upgrades. >>> >>> >>> Here is the diff between files in 219 and 224, if you want to know >>> more I can paste more info just let me know. >>> >>> https://gist.github.com/kraj/2a066973a5e5cf83ed24 >>> >>> sizes have gone up on daemons, no new daemons besides some new service >>> files >>> and scripts are added >>> >> >> ubu-15.10 will use v224 as well: >> http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/current/wily-desktop-amd64.manifest >> and Arch and a couple other distro are using this version already: >> http://pkgs.org/download/systemd >> >> v224 was released 3 weeks ago: >> --- >> $ git log -1 v224 >> commit b2a0ac5e5b29c73ca7c0da23369a4769d5a91ddd >> ... >> Date: Fri Jul 31 18:56:38 2015 +0200 >> --- >> >> Khem's summary of the binaries is reassuring given that there >> has been lots of churn: >> >> $ git log --oneline v219..v224 | wc -l >> 2167 >> $ git diff v219..v224 | diffstat | tail -1 >> 1367 files changed, 109907 insertions(+), 166577 deletions(-) >> >> I'm skimming the NEWS file from 219->224 and I haven't seen >> anything that concerns me yet: >> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/master/NEWS >> Qi, >> Please take a closer look at the NEWS file, >> review Khem's uprev and build and boot qemuarm64, qemuppc >> when you have time. Send partial feedback today even if you >> just review the commit and NEWS file. >> >> Qi may not be able to do that in the next couple of day >> due to SDK work. >> >> Khem, >> What testing have you done so far? >> Any ptest? >> What toolchain version are you building with, btw? >> >> >> It's late in M3 and we still have the kernel and toolchain coming in >> but unless we hear of known problems with v224, let's go for it >> once the new toolchain and kernel have settled. >> > -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
