On 5 June 2015 at 10:30, Jack Mitchell <m...@communistcode.co.uk> wrote:
> Ok, it's just quite a heavy dependancy for a package which is feasible to > be installed on very small systems; as you have proved by glib-2.0 not > beiing available in a non-x11 build. In this case I guess the way round it > would be to split out the alsa-tools packages, but that is also a lot of > work. The patch is fine and I don't use alsa-tools so I have no strong > feelings; I just like to keep and eye on and question bloat. > If someone feels strongly they can submit a patch to alsa-tools to make the glib dependency optional. Alternatively, split the alsa-tools packaging in some way. Ross
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
