On 04/08/2015 10:10 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Apr 7, 2015, at 6:55 PM, Robert Yang <liezhi.y...@windriver.com> wrote:
On 04/08/2015 09:34 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Apr 7, 2015, at 5:58 AM, Robert Yang <liezhi.y...@windriver.com> wrote:
There should be only one dev package which is libbz2-dev, so remove
bzip2-dev.
Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.y...@windriver.com>
---
meta/recipes-extended/bzip2/bzip2_1.0.6.bb | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/bzip2/bzip2_1.0.6.bb
b/meta/recipes-extended/bzip2/bzip2_1.0.6.bb
index ed12277..d1d1c8d 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-extended/bzip2/bzip2_1.0.6.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-extended/bzip2/bzip2_1.0.6.bb
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ SRC_URI[md5sum] = "00b516f4704d4a7cb50a1d97e6e8e15b"
SRC_URI[sha256sum] =
"a2848f34fcd5d6cf47def00461fcb528a0484d8edef8208d6d2e2909dc61d9cd"
PACKAGES =+ "libbz2 libbz2-dev libbz2-staticdev"
+PACKAGES_remove = "bzip2-dev bzip2-staticdev”
why remove ${PN}-dev ? others should be removed IMO
I think that it had added libbz2-dev was because debian/ubuntu uses
libbz2-dev, the similar to xz.
we have rpm and opkg hats as well.
OK, I will remove libbz2-dev as you and RP preferred.
// Robert
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
