On Sat, 2014-12-27 at 15:00 +0100, Mike Looijmans wrote:
> On 12/26/2014 02:59 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 11:48 PM, Hongxu Jia <hongxu....@windriver.com>
> > wrote:
> >> While building busybox with QA package-missing checking enabled,
> >> there was warning:
> >> ...
> >> WARNING: QA Issue: package busybox-mdev not generated, but listed in
> >> PACKAGES
> >> WARNING: QA Issue: package busybox-httpd not generated, but listed in
> >> PACKAGES
> >> ...
> >>
> >> The config in ${B}/.config decides to generate busybox-mdev,
> >> busybox-httpd or not. Files are copied if the packages generated.
> >> So set PACKAGES in do_package according to the existance of files.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Hongxu Jia <hongxu....@windriver.com>
> >
> > Shouldn't we "invert" the logic here? This patch 'removes' httpd and
> > mdev when those are not enabled. Why we don't /add/ those when they
> > are enabled?
>
> maybe the answer is in a question:
> What would happen then if someone typed "bitbake busybox-mdev"?
You'd get an error regardless since "busybox-mdev" isn't a recipe, its a
package and bitbake doesn't take package names.
Cheers,
Richard
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
