Op 3 nov. 2014, om 13:10 heeft Richard Purdie <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> het volgende geschreven:
> On Mon, 2014-11-03 at 13:06 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: >>> Op 3 nov. 2014, om 12:30 heeft Burton, Ross <ross.bur...@intel.com> het >>> volgende geschreven: >>> >>> >>> On 3 November 2014 11:27, Koen Kooi <k...@dominion.thruhere.net> wrote: >>>> Last night I was looking at my "post-1.7" tag and the number of aarch64 >>>> patches there. Kai, did you continue work on that staging branch for all >>>> of the aarch64 patches that were being posted? >>> >>> What does that have to do with this patch? >>> >>> Kai was collecting patches that were sent to oe-core, and this may have >>> been one of them. >> >> Is this some new requirement for OE-core patches? > > Its someone being helpful and trying to consolidate a topic branch and > test things before it gets merged. > > So its not a new requirement but it is helpful and appreciated. It's been over a month and libpng is still broken, so I refuse to classify this new process as 'helpful' or as 'appreciated' at this point. If this continues can the person doing such a branch reply to patches intended for it saying they will or won't be queued? And please run the patches without such a reply through the regular process. That would be both helpful and appreciated. -- Koen Kooi Builds and Baselines | Release Manager Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core