On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Burton, Ross <ross.bur...@intel.com> wrote: > On 15 September 2014 15:33, Otavio Salvador <ota...@ossystems.com.br> wrote: >> I think it is a way better base for work but I really don't care as I >> use my own recipe in fsl-arm and so does TI. > > And that's the problem really isn't it. :) Why do you both use your > own recipe, instead of keeping the u-boot in oe-core up to date?
Well we both require patches; this does not mean we ought to not keep OE-Core in sync (or close to). This is the reason why I advocate for the inclusion. Denys were working on this update for a while but he must have been pulled out of it due work commitments as usual ... so it ended sent now. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
