On Tuesday 09 September 2014 11:05:56 Paul Eggleton wrote:
> SSTATEPOSTINSTFUNCS needs to be set with ?= here - if it's = it'll wipe
> out what is set in that variable in buildhistory, which ends up being
> parsed earlier than the statement in sstate.bbclass. This fixes
> buildhistory no longer recording package information since OE-Core
> revision 9d659c6f20fa4a141b491c62a3ef0dfb1f896d9c.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> meta/classes/sstate.bbclass | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/classes/sstate.bbclass b/meta/classes/sstate.bbclass
> index ead829e..6a77d18 100644
> --- a/meta/classes/sstate.bbclass
> +++ b/meta/classes/sstate.bbclass
> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ SSTATE_MANMACH ?= "${SSTATE_PKGARCH}"
> SSTATECREATEFUNCS = "sstate_hardcode_path"
> SSTATEPREINSTFUNCS = ""
> SSTATEPOSTUNPACKFUNCS = "sstate_hardcode_path_unpack"
> -SSTATEPOSTINSTFUNCS = ""
> +SSTATEPOSTINSTFUNCS ?= ""
> EXTRA_STAGING_FIXMES ?= ""
>
> # Specify dirs in which the shell function is executed and don't use ${B}
OK, so Richard informs me that there was a good reason for making this change.
v2 incoming.
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
