> On Aug 6, 2014, at 7:42 AM, Paul Eggleton <paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com> > wrote: > >> On Wednesday 06 August 2014 16:37:34 Martin Jansa wrote: >>> On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 01:41:58PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: >>>> On Wednesday 06 August 2014 13:41:56 Martin Jansa wrote: >>>> * building with libav-9 fails with: >>>> | checking for POSTPROC... configure: error: Package requirements >>>> | (libpostproc libavcodec libavutil) were not met: >>>> | >>>> | No package 'libpostproc' found >>> >>> Does gst-ffmpeg actually work with libav > 0.8? >> >> No, not yet (see world status e-mails), but at least this is step >> in right direction IMHO and doesn't harm libav-0.8 users. > > I'm just not sure gst-ffmpeg should be allowed to get past this at all if > it's > not currently expected to work. The known working configuration is either > gst-ffmpeg + libav 0.8.x, or gstreamer1.0-libav + libav > 0.8.x. > I commented some time ago that 0.8/gst-ffmpeg should just go away... (Along with X but that's another subject). It just doesn't fit in the trend of multimedia FOSS anymore... Not that xbmc or vlc are ready for ffmpeg to go away... Sigh. Libpostproc is also an orphan in libav world, no activity since 2012. Schisms suck. But we seem to be committed to the libav bus, so keep calm and ride on.
--Tim -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
