On Aug 4, 2014 4:45 PM, "Ben Shelton" <ben.shel...@ni.com> wrote: > > On 08/04, Khem Raj wrote: > > On 14-08-04 13:40:53, Ben Shelton wrote: > > > From: Richard Tollerton <rich.toller...@ni.com> > > > > > > $DEVCACHE is observed to be 100k uncompressed; compressing it reduces > > > its size to ~5k. > > > > > > Natinst-Rally-ID: TA44427 > > > Acked-by: Gratian Crisan <gratian.cri...@ni.com> > > > Natinst-ReviewBoard-ID: 58620 > > > Signed-off-by: Richard Tollerton <rich.toller...@ni.com> > > > --- > > > meta/recipes-core/udev/udev/init | 2 +- > > > meta/recipes-core/udev/udev/udev-cache | 2 +- > > > meta/recipes-core/udev/udev/udev-cache.default | 2 +- > > > 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/udev/udev/init b/meta/recipes-core/udev/udev/init > > > index f2c84d5..1e69861 100644 > > > --- a/meta/recipes-core/udev/udev/init > > > +++ b/meta/recipes-core/udev/udev/init > > > @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ case "$1" in > > > readfiles /etc/udev/cache.data > > > OLDDATA="$READDATA" > > > if [ "$OLDDATA" = "$NEWDATA" ]; then > > > - (cd /; tar xf $DEVCACHE > /dev/null 2>&1) > > > + (cd /; tar xzf $DEVCACHE > /dev/null 2>&1) > > > > wouldnt cf still handle gz and xz or any other compression ? > > Do you mean xf? If so, then yes, I think it would. > > What would be the advantage of doing it that way? Just one fewer > change?
yes and tomorrow you might want to use different compression this wont change > > Thanks, > Ben >
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
