On 7/31/14, 8:45 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Thu, 2014-07-31 at 16:18 +0800, Robert Yang wrote:
On 07/31/2014 04:15 PM, Robert Yang wrote:
[YOCTO #4073]
Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.y...@windriver.com>
---
meta/conf/local.conf.sample.extended | 15 +++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/meta/conf/local.conf.sample.extended
b/meta/conf/local.conf.sample.extended
index 89b80a6..8ad7b6f 100644
--- a/meta/conf/local.conf.sample.extended
+++ b/meta/conf/local.conf.sample.extended
@@ -145,6 +145,13 @@
#MULTILIBS = "multilib:lib32"
#DEFAULTTUNE_virtclass-multilib-lib32 = "x86"
+# Set RPM_PREFER_COLOR to configure preferred ABI when using rpm packaging
+# backend to generate a rootfs, choices are:
+# 1: ELF32 wins
+# 2: ELF64 wins
+# 3: ELF64 N32 wins (for mips64 or mips64el only)
+#RPM_PREFER_COLOR ?= "2"
+
Is x86 x32 also color 3?
x32 support was never implemented. RPM has no unique identification for x32
binaries at this time. They're treated as ELF64 if I remember correctly.
If implemented, I would expect it to piggy back on '3' as well.
--Mark
Cheers,
Richard
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
