On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 5:28 PM, akuster <akus...@mvista.com> wrote: >>> >>> I think at very least you can propose it for meta-oe if not or-core. > > > I think core libcap-ng recipe belongs in a common layer and not maintained > in two places.
yes meta-oe is kind of extended common layer besides oe-core, if it can be proven that we can drop libpcap and replace its use completely with libpcap-ng you might have a better case to include it in oe-core, > > >>> But I also wonder why meta-selinux is not a sub-layer under >>> meta-security, >>> >> >> meta-selinux existed first... no other reason. >> >> >> The last time I looked at meta-security (well over a year ago), it >> wasn't terribly useful. > > > Well when a security package like 'snort' and maybe others are in other > locations, I can see why meta-security won't be very useful. > > > It was just a random collection of >> >> security-like packages, some worked, some didn't. > > > Hopefully that will change. -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
