> > Op 28 jul. 2014, om 08:49 heeft Huang, Jie (Jackie) > <jackie.hu...@windriver.com> het volgende > geschreven: > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Koen Kooi [mailto:k...@dominion.thruhere.net] > >> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 2:30 PM > >> To: Huang, Jie (Jackie) > >> Cc: OE-core; Richard Purdie > >> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] alsa-lib: remove non PN based -dev > >> packages > >> > >> > >> Op 25 jul. 2014, om 12:05 heeft jackie.hu...@windriver.com het volgende > >> geschreven: > >> > >>> From: Jackie Huang <jackie.hu...@windriver.com> > >>> > >>> All dev related items should be packaged in the core PN-dev package > >>> not in seperate packages. > >> > >> What's the upgrade path here for image and users that have 'alsa-dev' > >> installed? Looks like there are > > > > My patch is removing 'alsa-dev' and all related files goes into > > '${PN}-dev' (PN=alsa-lib here), so users need to install alsa-lib-dev > > instead of alsa-dev. > > *sigh* So you have no upgrade path for situations where 'alsa-dev' is already > installed or listed in a > packagegroup or image. Worse, you don't even understand the problem :/
I see your point, I did grep on oe-core and meta-oe and didn't find any evidence that 'alsa-dev' is installed or listed In a packagegroup or image, so I thought it's safe to remove without RREPLACES/RPROVIDES in place, sorry that I did a wrong assumption, I will add a RPROVIDES for this, thanks! Thanks, Jackie > > > > >> now 2 conflicting packages, 'alsa-dev' in the feeds and > >> 'alsa-lib-dev' on OE, without and > > > > Only 'alsa-lib-dev' now with my patch, so no conflicts. > > Hahahahahaha you are really funny. -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
