On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 5:53 AM, Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:10:50PM -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 04:41:52PM -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >>> >> With lttng 2.4.2 and gcc 4.9, we can now enable lttng-modules for ARM. >>> >> >>> >> Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com> >>> >> --- >>> >> meta/recipes-kernel/lttng/lttng-modules_2.5.0.bb | 3 +-- >>> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) >>> >> >>> >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/lttng/lttng-modules_2.5.0.bb >>> >> b/meta/recipes-kernel/lttng/lttng-modules_2.5.0.bb >>> >> index 5a99a5adae8b..d87374163556 100644 >>> >> --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/lttng/lttng-modules_2.5.0.bb >>> >> +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/lttng/lttng-modules_2.5.0.bb >>> >> @@ -12,8 +12,7 @@ inherit module >>> >> >>> >> SRCREV = "789fd1d06d07aeb9a403bdce1b3318560cfc6eca" >>> >> >>> >> -# lttng currently blacklists arm with gcc-4.8 >>> >> -COMPATIBLE_HOST = '(x86_64|i.86|powerpc|aarch64|mips).*-linux' >>> >> +COMPATIBLE_HOST = '(x86_64|i.86|powerpc|aarch64|mips|arm).*-linux' >>> > >>> > Please squash this to 2/8 otherwise there is no arm version between 2/8 >>> > and 6/8. >>> >>> I'd rather not, since they are separate activities. I updated to 2.5, >>> and then enable >>> ARM. One isolated change per commit. Bisectability in a small series is one >>> thing, but also is the isolation of changes. >> >> 2/8 commit message says: >> >> We also drop the older 2.3.3 lttng-modules, since it is no longer >> required to support ARM builds. >> >> Which isn't true at that time and it means that these changes aren't >> separate activities. >> >> To keep them separate, remove 2.3.3 in this commit, not in upgrade to >> 2.5.0. (or with more work involved, enable arm in 2.4* together with >> 2.3.3 removal as someone reported arm+2.4* also working now). > > That'll work, but not on tap for me today. I've got a whole set of backed up > change behind my 3.16 work. > > If Richard or Saul care, won't object to any splitting or squashing they > want to do.
And I of course hit send to soon. There was supposed to be a second sentence here. ".. before I can split and retest over the weekend". *sigh*. Off to get a coffee. Bruce > > Bruce > >> >>> Richard can squash on merge is he wants, but I'm going to leave it as is. >>> >>> Bruce >>> >>> > >>> >> SRC_URI = "git://git.lttng.org/lttng-modules.git;branch=stable-2.5 \ >>> >> file://lttng-modules-replace-KERNELDIR-with-KERNEL_SRC.patch >>> >> \ >>> >> -- >>> >> 1.8.1.2 >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> Openembedded-core mailing list >>> >> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org >>> >> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: martin.ja...@gmail.com >>> > >>> > -- >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > Openembedded-core mailing list >>> > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org >>> > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await >>> thee at its end" >> >> -- >> Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: martin.ja...@gmail.com > > > > -- > "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await > thee at its end" -- "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at its end" -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
