On Monday 14 July 2014 07:39:23 Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Mon, 14 Jul 2014, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > On Friday 11 July 2014 20:39:04 Otavio Salvador wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Robert P. J. Day > > > > > > <rpj...@crashcourse.ca> wrote: > > > > a number of the current packagegroup recipe files still have > > > > > > > > backward compatibility support for the old "task-core" names, seems > > > > like that's been there for well over a year, would it be safe to > > > > finally just toss that? seems like everyone's had enough time to make > > > > the move to the new names, and it would be clearer to not confuse the > > > > proper use of the word "task" these days. > > > > > > I agree; however this question should also be send to oe-core mailing > > > list (added in Cc) > > > > I agree as well; these should go. I know there are some who want to > > keep these indefinitely for upgrade purposes, but I think there's a > > limit to how long they should stay around in OE-Core. They can > > always be preserved in bbappends for those that do want to keep > > them. > > one more (general) question about this ... there's a fair bit of > this task/packagegroup backward compatibility stuff under the meta-oe > layer as well. i assume that patches to the meta-oe layer should still > be posted to this list, but have a subject line of: > > [meta-oe][PATCH] ... > > correct? as in, two separate patches.
To be clear (since we're cross-posted to two lists in this thread) OE-Core patches go to the openembedded-core list, meta-oe patches to the openembedded- devel list. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
