On 05/01/2014 02:34 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
Hi Valentin,
On Wednesday 30 April 2014 18:39:31 Valentin Popa wrote:
Newer versions of gnutls depends on nettle.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Popa <valentin.p...@intel.com>
---
meta/recipes-support/nettle/nettle_2.7.1.bb | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 meta/recipes-support/nettle/nettle_2.7.1.bb
diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/nettle/nettle_2.7.1.bb
b/meta/recipes-support/nettle/nettle_2.7.1.bb new file mode 100644
index 0000000..eb7c9de
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta/recipes-support/nettle/nettle_2.7.1.bb
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+DESCRIPTION = "A low level cryptographic library"
Since this value is short, could you please set it as SUMMARY instead?
+HOMEPAGE = "http://www.lysator.liu.se/~nisse/nettle/";
+SECTION = "libs"
+LICENSE = "GPLv2+"
Is this license value correct? From the documentation:
"Nettle is distributed under the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL), see
the file COPYING.LIB for details"
I'll add both GPLv2 AND LGPLv2.1 (GPL contamination) .
It looks like it might be even more complicated than that, since there is also
a GPLv2 copying file in the 2.7.1 source.
+LIC_FILES_CHKSUM =
"file://COPYING.LIB;md5=2d5025d4aa3495befef8f17206a5b0a1"
Given the above we'd probably want to checksum more than just this file.
Cheers,
Paul
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
