-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Paul Eggleton schreef op 28-04-14 13:08: > On Monday 28 April 2014 12:43:58 Koen Kooi wrote: >> Op 28 apr. 2014, om 12:10 heeft Paul Eggleton > <paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com> het volgende > geschreven: >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> Could whoever has admin access for the OpenEmbedded repositories on >>> github please do two things: >>> >>> 1) Stop having both "oe-core" and "openembedded-core" repositories - >>> the latter is four months out-of-date. I'd suggest if we want to be >>> consistent with our openembedded.org repos we should keep the >>> "openembedded-core" repository and make it so it is kept up-to-date. >>> >>> 2) Rename the "meta-oe" repository to "meta-openembedded", since >>> meta-oe the layer is distinct from meta-openembedded the repository, >>> and again this would be consistent with the primary repository >>> naming. >> >> Keep in mind that renaming/removing 'oe-core' and 'meta-oe' will >> breaks things which use those repos to pull from by default. Which the >> oe.org git server has improved a lot, it still can't beat githubs CDN. > > OK then, how about this instead: > > 1) Ensure the "openembedded-core" repository is kept up-to-date > > 2) Add a "meta-openembedded" repository and ensure it is kept up-to-date > > 3) Add a warning to the description for the contracted name repositories > that the fully-named repositories should be used instead, so we can > eventually drop them > > 4) Change documentation / scripts to match #3
Sounds like a good plan to me! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iD8DBQFTXk1mMkyGM64RGpERAn8NAJ49r8TimCZIouIBM45jseXqA3xUCACdGPsh jb5olKQRlsskP9x4vlmEIms= =FqlW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
