On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Laszlo Papp <lp...@kde.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Burton, Ross <ross.bur...@intel.com> wrote:
>> On 20 March 2014 12:44, Laszlo Papp <lp...@kde.org> wrote:
>>> You are free to NACK without an explanation why it is important, but
>>> do not expect it to weigh much that way, at least in my eyes, based on
>>> that you are not even a maintainer as far as I know.
>>
>> One good reason: systemd reads the LSB headers.
>
> This init script is for SysV, not systemd.

Laszlo, we made several valid points. The outcome is we don't want to
have more init scripts lacking LSB headers. The desire to have this
patch is yours so if you want to have our ack, address those remarks.

As I said, it is your call to handle it or not.

I am not the maintainer of OE-Core, so I don't have a final word on
this (Richard does) but I made clear my point and my NACK for current
status of the patch.


-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750
-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to