On Saturday 01 March 2014 18:21:59 Paul Barker wrote: > On 1 March 2014 18:10, Otavio Salvador <ota...@ossystems.com.br> wrote: > > Hello David, > > > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 4:59 PM, David Nyström <david.c.nyst...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > >> On 2014-02-27 16:18, Laurentiu Palcu wrote: > >>> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 03:35:50PM +0100, David Nyström wrote: > >>>> On 2014-02-27 15:24, Laurentiu Palcu wrote: > >>>>> Hi David, > >>>>> > >>>>> My comments/questions below. > >>>> > >>>> Thank you for your detailed comments on the RFC. > >>>> I will return with V2, where your comments are addressed when the > >>>> general approach is Acked. > >>>> > >>>> What do you think about the general approach ? > >>> > >>> I think the approach is ok. I don't know a simpler way than this to add > >>> package feeds into the image. > >> > >> OK, there seems to be no screaming objections from other parties either. > >> > >> I'll resend v2 > > > > I understand why you are adding this here but I think it'd be good to the > > settings to be put in a package so in a product we may add extra > > repositories updating the package. > > > > I am trying to think now how this could be done (or optionally done). > > > > What you think? > > +1 > > I'd rather have '/etc/opkg/base-feeds.conf' (for example) generated > and placed into a package which is then installed on the rootfs. That > would make it easy to distribute an update to that in the future. I'm > not sure how difficult/easy that would be.
The only problem with this is you then can't have your feeds different per image. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
