Op 22 feb. 2014, om 20:52 heeft Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> het volgende geschreven:
> > On Feb 22, 2014, at 10:12 AM, Phil Blundell <p...@pbcl.net> wrote: > >> On Sat, 2014-02-22 at 01:31 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: >>> builds might work but they won’t run and yes so far IFUNC support is needed >>> so it won’t work on non-x86 >>> architectures. One common runtime problem I am seeing is logind not being >>> able to talk to dbus >>> across all architectures. I have pushed my latest rework to pull branch >> >> What is the problem with ifunc on non-x86? > > they are not enabled across all architectures, well specifically, its not > enabled on arm and seems also ppc is missing it. > >> As far as I know the >> compiler, assembler, linker and ld.so for all reasonable architectures >> support that nowadays (though prelink support is a bit patchy). GCC >> didn't have ifuncs enabled for some architectures until quite recently >> but if that was the problem then you'd see compile-time failures. So, >> if it compiles then I can't think of any reason why it oughtn't to run. > > systemd is using ifuncs to patch up the library migration it has done in 209 > so it only shows up when we enable compat lib support in systemd, and if we > patch the apps to forward port to systemd 209 then we don’t need to enable > compat lib support and > it could be left alone. Or we can cherry-pick http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/commit/?id=03e37dd767e52908f30783d9b4c09fb6a4e865c7 :) > > if we want to enable compat libs/ifunc then we can think of adding > --enable-gnu-indirect-function > to gcc configure but then it may not work on all architectures that we are > interested in. > > >> Is this a uclibc thing? > > no > >> >> p. >> >> > _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
