Thank you for this contribution. As a side note, please consider the documentation bits in the future as well. :-) I have just opened a separate ticket for that here:
https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5770 On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Richard Purdie <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > Its rather sad that people don't appear to read local.conf and then complain > about slow builds when they're just using a single thread. Most systems have > more than one core now so we might as well use a more automatic default > for these values. This may lead to better experiences for new users. > > [YOCTO #2528] > > Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> > --- > diff --git a/meta/conf/local.conf.sample b/meta/conf/local.conf.sample > index 71856b8..36d33e1 100644 > --- a/meta/conf/local.conf.sample > +++ b/meta/conf/local.conf.sample > @@ -18,12 +18,18 @@ > # option determines how many tasks bitbake should run in parallel: > # > #BB_NUMBER_THREADS ?= "4" > +# > +# Default to setting automatically based on cpu count > +BB_NUMBER_THREADS ?= "${@oe.utils.cpu_count()}" > # > # The second option controls how many processes make should run in parallel > when > # running compile tasks: > # > #PARALLEL_MAKE ?= "-j 4" > # > +# Default to setting automatically based on cpu count > +PARALLEL_MAKE ?= "-j ${@oe.utils.cpu_count()}" > +# > # For a quad-core machine, BB_NUMBER_THREADS = "4", PARALLEL_MAKE = "-j 4" > would > # be appropriate for example. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
