On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 10:29 -0800, Darren Hart wrote: > Reverting the patch allows me to move forward, but yes, I'm surprised we > aren't seeing more build failures.... I wonder what makes us special?
For some reason I still don't have the email I can see you sent from the list archives. What is interesting is that: a) you have gcc 4.6, I have gcc 4.8 b) the error appears to come from error.h in SCM_NORETURN definitions c) the config log for autogen shows different results for "checking for working stdnoreturn.h", yes in my case, no in yours. The definition of SCM_NORETURN is from __scm.h: #define SCM_NORETURN __attribute__ ((noreturn)) and the dummy stdnoreturn.h that autogen would generate does: #define noreturn _Noreturn and then _Noreturn.h defines: # define _Noreturn __attribute__ ((__noreturn__)) so I think what is happening is there is double macro overlap with #define SCM_NORETURN __attribute__ ((noreturn)) becoming #define SCM_NORETURN __attribute__ ((__attribute__ ((__noreturn__)))) How we fix it I have no idea. We should check and see if someone fixed this upstream to start with. Robert, now we know what to look for, can you help? Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
