On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 05:33:20PM +0800, Robert Yang wrote:
>
>
> On 01/16/2014 05:25 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:14:30AM +0800, Robert Yang wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 01/16/2014 12:55 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:20:14AM +0800, Robert Yang wrote:
> >>>> * The archive*.bbclass didn't work, and there were a few problems, for
> >>>> example:
> >>>> 1) There were a few duplicated code
> >>>> 2) There was no src_dir.org (or orig), but the diff command still use
> >>>> it, and it is not easy to fix this issue if we don't change a lot
> >>>> of the code.
> >>>> 3) It didn't archive the source for the native or gcc
> >>>> 4) The work flow is not very well
> >>>> 5) The "subprocess.call('fakeroot cp xxxx'" should be removed
> >>>> 6) And others ...
> >>>>
> >>>> * So that we have to refactor it, the benefits are:
> >>>> 1) Fix the problems and make it work well.
> >>>> 2) Reduce more than 400 lines in total.
> >>>> 3) Make it easy to use.
> >>>>
> >>>> // Robert
> >>>>
> >>>> The following changes since commit
> >>>> 1b636173ca88e5ccca1992f9a12367a1189fa674:
> >>>>
> >>>> bitbake: toaster: Toaster GUI, generic search, filter and order
> >>>> (2014-01-10 15:20:26 +0000)
> >>>>
> >>>> are available in the git repository at:
> >>>>
> >>>> git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib rbt/archiver
> >>>> http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=rbt/archiver
> >>>
> >>> Can you send pull-request for oe-core?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Here it is:
> >> git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib rbt/ar_oe
> >> http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=rbt/ar_oe
> >
> > This still looks like poky-contrib (so it will download whole
> > poky-contrib when I add it as remote to oe-core repo).
> >
>
> Sorry, I can't create repo on oe-contrib, seems that I lost my key.That's sad, you should send new one to khem to replace it, before someone else finds your old key. > How about: > > git fetch git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib rbt/ar_oe That still fetches whole poky repo I'm not interested in. So I've downloaded just archiver.bbclass manually and tested it on my use-case, I can confirm that it doesn't remove required file anymore, but it seems that there is something terribly broken when used in combination with rm_work or multimachine builds. I haven't debugged it yet, but 2nd build (in the same directory) with this new archiver included almost every recipe failed in do_patch task. > >> // Robert > >> > >>>> Robert Yang (5): > >>>> classes/archive*.bbclass: remove archive-*-source.bbclass > >>>> archiver.bbclass: refactor it > >>>> package_rpm.bbclass: archive the source to srpm package > >>>> archiver.bbclass: move a few code to copyleft_compliance.bbclass > >>>> local.conf.sample.extended: update for the archiver > >>>> > >>>> meta-yocto/conf/local.conf.sample.extended | 72 +-- > >>>> meta/classes/archive-configured-source.bbclass | 65 --- > >>>> meta/classes/archive-original-source.bbclass | 65 --- > >>>> meta/classes/archive-patched-source.bbclass | 65 --- > >>>> meta/classes/archiver.bbclass | 723 > >>>> ++++++++----------------- > >>>> meta/classes/copyleft_compliance.bbclass | 55 +- > >>>> meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass | 31 +- > >>>> 7 files changed, 316 insertions(+), 760 deletions(-) > >>>> delete mode 100644 meta/classes/archive-configured-source.bbclass > >>>> delete mode 100644 meta/classes/archive-original-source.bbclass > >>>> delete mode 100644 meta/classes/archive-patched-source.bbclass > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> 1.8.3.1 > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Openembedded-core mailing list > >>>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > >>>> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > >>> > > -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: martin.ja...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
