On Thursday 28 November 2013 13:29:32 Chris Larson wrote: > On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 3:17 AM, Paul Eggleton < > paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > On Wednesday 27 November 2013 11:42:06 Chris Larson wrote: > > > Will this have its own repository like all the other poky integrated > > > layers? It really should, in my opinion. > > > > It really needs to stay in the same place as the tests that rely on it; > > they can't work without it. It might be suggested that the tests should go > > elsewhere with them; but I don't think that would make sense - we want > > people to be able to run these tests easily if they make changes to OE- > > Core to check if they have caused any regressions. > > > > If you have a look at the layer, there's not a lot in it, and I wouldn't > > expect a lot to be added in future. One possible change would be to just > > have the layer created on the fly in some temporary directory by the tests > > themselves, rather than having it in the repository; on the other hand it > > does make it a bit more difficult to look into outside of the test > > environment. > > I understand what you’re saying, but if this script is supposed to be > generally useful for OE/Yocto, not just Poky, then the poky repository > shouldn’t be its definitive location.
Poky isn't its definitive location, it has been sent as a pull request to the OE-Core mailing list to be applied on top of OE-Core. > Further, patches against oe-core should be submitted against the oe-core > repository, not the poky repository, and anything poky specific should go to > the poky list. Point taken, but there isn't actually anything poky-specific in this series. Can we please concentrate on the content of the patches? Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
