On 9 September 2013 17:57, Kamble, Nitin A <nitin.a.kam...@intel.com> wrote: > This is a clever way to deal with unnecessary rebuilding of mesa we were > seeing earlier. With this mesa-gl, > the mesa also need modification to remove gl from the default recipe.
No, mesa and mesa-gl intentionally conflict. mesa-gl provides GL, emgd-driver-bin provides EGL and GLES, your machines shouldn't need both mesa and mesa-gl. > Also looks like there is a need from community for mesa-gl-lib and > mesa-gl-headers, as some > platforms need just the mesa-gl-headers and not the libs. To be honest GL platforms that don't ship their own headers are *totally broken* and using mesa's headers is basically the same as crossing your fingers and praying to $DEITY. Platforms that do this need to be fixed, not worked around, and taking Mesa's headers without editing them is just wrong. Ross _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
