Hi Ross, For evaluating the correct functionality of harfbuzz, I built and ran core-image-sato. The text looked OK, I try to see if there are some issues in any of the included apps. Did not find any, so I considered that the harfbuzz upgrade went OK. Are there any other more complex tests to perform?
I will try to disseminate the information that you provided and come back with fixes. Given the load that I am experiencing, I am not sure it will happen this week. Regards, Cristian -----Original Message----- From: Burton, Ross [mailto:ross.bur...@intel.com] Sent: Monday, August 05, 2013 8:19 PM To: Iorga, Cristian Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 4/4] harfbuzz: upgrade to v0.9.19 Hi Cristian, I did a buildhistory-diff and noticed more than the expected churn. See the upstream NEWS for some important changes: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/harfbuzz/tree/NEWS """ Moreover, ICU support is now build into a separate library: libharfbuzz-icu.so, and a new harfbuzz-icu.pc is shipped for it. Distros can enable ICU now without every application on earth getting linked to via libharfbuzz.so. For distros I recommend that they make sure they are building --with-glib --with-freetype --with-cairo, --with-icu, and optionally --with-graphite2; And package harfbuzz and harfbuzz-icu separately. """ We should split out the ICU package, and re-evaluate disable_graphite.patch/submit upstream if it is a genuine problem with the build system. Ross _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
