OK, I give up the contribution. I really cannot collaborate with people who think it is acceptable to break *many* users' life for the whole project without being able to use anything in favor of a very limited (!) people with only two (!) applications.
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Burton, Ross <ross.bur...@intel.com>wrote: > On 29 July 2013 11:20, Phil Blundell <p...@pbcl.net> wrote: > > But in this particular case, your new patch seems to have more serious > > problems since it will cause rfkill to silently disappear for many > > people who do currently have it. > > > > If your distro selects a toolchain which doesn't contain the necessary > > bits to support rfkill then it seems as though the appropriate course of > > action would be to either: > > I'm in agreement with Phil. Whilst support for userspaces that from > 2009 is patchy at best with modern software (you'll need an equally > old udev, systemd won't happen, etc) this is a trivial change but > let's be clear that it's an option to handle older external userspaces > and not our so there should be a PACKAGECONFIG for rfkill that > defaults to enabled. > > Ross >
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
