On 3 July 2013 14:40, Paul Eggleton <paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> + lib_re = re.compile("^/lib.*\.so[0-9.]*$")
> + exec_re = re.compile("^%s.*/lib.*\.so[0-9.]*$" % exec_prefix)
I'd been meaning to double-check this assumption since the discussion
yesterday, and I'm glad I did. My Debian machine has these files in
/usr/lib that don't match that regex:
libatlas.so.3gf
libblas.so.3gf
libcblas.so.3gf
libf77blas.so.3gf
liblapack_atlas.so.3gf
liblapack.so.3gf
libmozjs.so.10d
libnspr4.so.0d
libnss3.so.1d
libnssutil3.so.1d
libplc4.so.0d
libplds4.so.0d
libsmime3.so.1d
libssl3.so.1d
How about ^lib.+\.so(\..+)?$ to match a library filename?
Ross
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
