Thanks Paul. Fonts all ok now. For the benefit of anyone else listening here's what I ended up with
IMAGE_INSTALL += " \ qt4-embedded-fonts-ttf-vera \ qtui \ " ttf-vera fonts are about 500k in total, but could be cut down to ~100k in my case as I don't really need italics (eg just use Vera.ttf and VeraBd.ttf) Qt libraries were about 25Mb in total which I expect could be reduced a bit, but think I have enough information for now. On 10 June 2013 15:03, Paul Eggleton <paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > On Monday 10 June 2013 14:46:57 John Stirling wrote: > > Looking fairly promising so far. Image size down from 280Mb to 90Mb and > > only Qt related stuff now seems to be in /usr/lib/ > > > > The font's seem to be missing though - > > QFontDatabase: Cannot find font directory /usr/lib/fonts - is Qt > installed > > correctly? > > We won't need all the fonts in any case but would you expect them to have > > been pulled in automatically ? > > Right, for Qt/E if you are displaying any text you'll need to explicitly > install the package for this since nothing depends upon it. You can install > the qt4-embedded-fonts package which brings in all fonts that are > distributed > with Qt, or alternatively you can install only the fonts you want (qt4- > embedded-fonts-ttf-vera, etc.) > > > Pretty sure I need the first 3, but not sure about the rest. Does that > look > > about right to you size wise ? We're just trying to tie down flash sizes > at > > the moment and want to get a fairly accurate estimate for Qt. > > This looks reasonable to me. Note however if you start changing some of the > build-time configuration options for Qt you may be able to disable a few > things > you don't need. Have a look at Qt's configuration options [1]. You can see > exactly which options are being used to build Qt with: > > bitbake -e | grep "^QT_CONFIG_FLAGS=" > > If you search for QT_CONFIG_FLAGS under meta/recipes-qt/qt4/ you'll see how > this variable gets set. > > > I guess also at some point we might want to switch to Qt5. Is that > > comparable in size ? > > Not sure I'm afraid, although I believe it is more modular so in theory you > should be able to cut out more pieces you don't need. > > Cheers, > Paul > > [1] http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-4.8/configure-options.html > > -- > > Paul Eggleton > Intel Open Source Technology Centre >
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
