On Wednesday 05 June 2013 10:01:09 Saul Wold wrote:
> On 06/05/2013 09:57 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > On Wednesday 05 June 2013 09:46:49 Saul Wold wrote:
> >> On 06/05/2013 02:30 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 07:01:50PM +1000, Jonathan Liu wrote:
> >>>> qconfig.pri was not being loaded by qmake properly. This means Qt
> >>>> qmake projects are unable to query QT_ARCH, QT_VERSION and other
> >>>> variables defined in qconfig.pri.
> >>>>
> >>>> Export OE_QMAKE_QT_CONFIG, setting it to the location of qconfig.pri
> >>>> so that it can be located by qmake.
> >>>
> >>> There is such patch already:
> >>> http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2013-May/07831
> >>> 4.
> >>> html
> >>
> >> Got lost in my queue, adding it for the next MUT.
> >
> > FWIW I am still concerned by the assertion in the commit message about it
> > causing undesirable behaviour. I'd want that checked out and the note
> > removed before we look at merging this.
>
> OK, I will shelf this until I hear more about the testing of this change
> regarding the original patch's note.
So I tested a rebuild of qt4-x11-free with Felipe's patch and two of
Jonathan's ("qt4: fix QMAKE_QT_CONFIG being overwritten with empty value" and
"classes/qmake_base: allow parallel make"), and did not observe any unexpected
behaviour and buildhistory looks clean for qt itself and fotowall/quicky. So
I'd say feel free to throw these into MUT, but I think we need to drop the
note.
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
