On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Marko Lindqvist <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 29 May 2013 13:14, Burton, Ross <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 26 May 2013 15:03, Marko Lindqvist <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Last gtk2-compatible version of vte is 0.28.2 currently present on OE >> core. >> > Later versions depend on gtk3. >> >> vte supports both gtk2 and gtk3. >> > > 0.30.0 NEWS states that "dropped support for gtk2". While this sounds > like upstream 0.28.2 would work with either gtk2 or gtk3, OE recipe depends > on "gtk+", which is always gtk2? > > >> > Since gtk3 exist in OE core, it would make >> > sense to be able to build version of vte (and other similar packages) >> > that does not depend on gtk2. Otherwise we end with systems that must >> > contain both gtk2 (to be used by some programs) and gtk3 (to be used by >> > other programs). >> > This patch just adds new recipe for latest vte version, 0.34.5, >> alongside >> > with 0.28.2 version. >> > How should priorities be set? "1" for gtk2-version, so it gets selected >> despite gtk3-version being newer? >> >> Because they are *not* drop-in replacements, how about naming the gtk3 >> vte vte3_3.34.5.bb? >> > > I think calling it vte3 would be confusing at best, when vte itself is > not version 3.x. How about "vte-gtk3"? > So I would say to rename vte to vte-gtk2 at same time and make it provide vte for now. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://projetos.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
