On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 10:10:45AM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Thursday 16 May 2013 10:59:54 Martin Jansa wrote: > > On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 09:29:48AM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > > On Thursday 16 May 2013 08:31:33 Koen Kooi wrote: > > > > Removing layers is pretty much impossible, though. > > > > > > With PRINC gone would there be any other issue that would make removing > > > layers a problem? > > > > Does PR service really fix removing layers? I don't think so, if you add > > layer and checksum of foo is changed AUTOPR is incremented, but then you > > remove the layer and the checksum is unfortunately the same as what you > > had before AUTOPR will go backwards. > > Then I would have to say if that's not the behaviour you want we should > change > it or at least make it optional to force it to always increment even if the > checksum is the same as a previous value.
That won't work with multiple builders using the same PR server (I don't wont other builders to always increment PRAUTOs used in builds which populate official feed). -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: martin.ja...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
