On 01/05/13 21:29, Darren Hart wrote:
> 
> 
> On 05/01/2013 01:24 PM, tf+lists.yo...@r-finger.com wrote:
>> From: Tomas Frydrych <to...@sleepfive.com>
>>
>> The kernel is now located in DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE rather than sysroot.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tomas Frydrych <to...@sleepfive.com>
>> ---
>>  meta/classes/image_types.bbclass |    2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/classes/image_types.bbclass 
>> b/meta/classes/image_types.bbclass
>> index 98d31f5..0e1ad3a 100644
>> --- a/meta/classes/image_types.bbclass
>> +++ b/meta/classes/image_types.bbclass
>> @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ IMAGE_CMD_cpio () {
>>      cd ${IMAGE_ROOTFS} && (find . | cpio -o -H newc 
>> >${DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE}/${IMAGE_NAME}.rootfs.cpio)
>>  }
>>  
>> -ELF_KERNEL ?= "${STAGING_DIR_HOST}/kernel/${KERNEL_IMAGETYPE}"
>> +ELF_KERNEL ?= "${DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE}/${KERNEL_IMAGETYPE}-${MACHINE}.bin"
> 
> 
> Looks correct, how did this fail before? What was the symptom?

e.g.,

| Cannot open `...../tmp/sysroots/nuc/kernel/bzImage': (null)

Two bugs really, the location has changed, and it was using a kernel
that is not machine-specific. I'll make a patch with better commit
message tomorrow.

Tomas

-- 
http://sleepfive.com

_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to