Op 15 apr. 2013, om 13:00 heeft Enrico Scholz <enrico.sch...@sigma-chemnitz.de> het volgende geschreven:
> Ross Burton <ross.burton-ral2jqcrhueavxtiumw...@public.gmane.org> > writes: > >> Following the example set by udev, move the binaries to /sbin/systemd >> and hardcode less paths in general. Tested on atom-pc with a .hddimg >> so the live boot/initrd paths were tested. > > At least the moving of udev breaks a lot of local recipes here which > install e.g. local rules or keymaps in /lib/udev. This is a silent break > which is detected at device runtime only. The global 'bitbake.conf' has > not been updated for the new paths neither. > > > There should be: > > 1. added some QA checks which detect this broken packaging > > 2. added some global variables (e.g. 'udev_basedir') which can be used > in the rules. These patches can get NAK'd all you want, but they will go in. I still say: NAK, this is a bad, bad idea. It diverges from upstream and introduces silent breakage as you point out due to that. _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
