Is "libpng" the new canonical name for 1.6?  I assume there was a reason
it was listed last.  It looks like the current logic came from:

https://git.gnome.org/browse/gdk-pixbuf/commit/?id=ddedf5a2c2c63bfe8d6f04376cf2bba215a5eb19

Which is a not very enlightening commit message.  It looks like the
Fedora 18 "libpng" package provides both libpng.pc and libpng15.pc.
RHEL6 has the same except it's libpng12.pc too.  My Ubuntu 12.10 VM has
libpng12 with just libpng12.pc, no libpng.pc.

My main concern with this patch was ensuring that people aren't getting
a suddenly ancient and deprecated libpng, but that seems unlikely, so
unless there are other comments I can take care of turning this into
"git format-patch" style and pushing upstream.

On Sat, 2013-04-13 at 11:25 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> We now have libpng 1.6. If we build libpng12 as well as libpng 1.6, the 1.2
> version gets preferred which is not desirable and does not give deterministic 
> builds.
> 
> We really do want to use libpng since the item in DEPENDS will provide this so
> manipulate the search list so the one we DEPEND on gets chosen. This was the 
> cause of a
> recent autobuilder failure.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org>
> ---
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-gnome/gdk-pixbuf/gdk-pixbuf-2.26.5/pngversion.patch 
> b/meta/recipes-gnome/gdk-pixbuf/gdk-pixbuf-2.26.5/pngversion.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..81a3d06
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/meta/recipes-gnome/gdk-pixbuf/gdk-pixbuf-2.26.5/pngversion.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
> +We now have libpng 1.6. If we build libpng12 as well as libpng 1.6, the 1.2 
> version gets 
> +preferred which is not desirable and does not give deterministic builds.
> +
> +We really do want to use libpng since the item in DEPENDS will provide this 
> so
> +manipulate the search list so the one we DEPEND on gets chosen.
> +
> +RP 2013/4/13
> +
> +Upstream-Status: Pending [worth discussing at least]
> +
> +Index: gdk-pixbuf-2.26.5/configure.ac
> +===================================================================
> +--- gdk-pixbuf-2.26.5.orig/configure.ac      2013-03-26 15:45:16.594820303 
> +0000
> ++++ gdk-pixbuf-2.26.5/configure.ac   2013-04-13 10:15:19.241433789 +0000
> +@@ -588,7 +588,7 @@
> + 
> + dnl Test for libpng
> +   if test x$with_libpng != xno && test -z "$LIBPNG"; then
> +-    for l in libpng15 libpng14 libpng12 libpng13 libpng10 libpng ; do
> ++    for l in libpng libpng15 libpng14 libpng12 libpng13 libpng10 ; do
> +       AC_MSG_CHECKING(for $l)
> +       if $PKG_CONFIG --exists $l ; then
> +         AC_MSG_RESULT(yes)
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-gnome/gdk-pixbuf/gdk-pixbuf_2.26.5.bb 
> b/meta/recipes-gnome/gdk-pixbuf/gdk-pixbuf_2.26.5.bb
> index cc2ea50..b35f7c6 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-gnome/gdk-pixbuf/gdk-pixbuf_2.26.5.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-gnome/gdk-pixbuf/gdk-pixbuf_2.26.5.bb
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ SRC_URI = 
> "http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/GNOME/sources/gdk-pixbuf/2.26/gdk-pixbuf-${
>             file://hardcoded_libtool.patch \
>             file://configure_fix.patch \
>             file://extending-libinstall-dependencies.patch \
> +           file://pngversion.patch \
>             "
>  
>  SRC_URI[md5sum] = "339329e6d619ee3e1cb93979111b04c0"
> 
> 



_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to